Menu

Skip to content

Money Talks: Empowering Students to Drive Their School’s Budget

By Andrew Frank
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

As a fifth grade teacher, I always found the first few weeks of a new school year to be overwhelming. In order to manage curriculum planning, day-long meetings, and classroom supplies, I shifted the responsibility of setting classroom rules to my students. Not only did it free up some of my time, doing so also gave my students more ownership of the rules, leading them to be invested in holding themselves and their classmates accountable. Giving voice and power to my students showed them I respected their ideas as we established shared values in our classroom.

Just as my students created our classroom rules, students can be drivers of their school community by engaging in participatory budgeting. Participatory budgeting is a democratic process in which community members decide how to spend part of a public budget, and in schools, this typically involves anywhere from $2,500 to $50,000 of the principal’s discretionary budget. The idea started in Brazil in 1989, where it has shown positive effects, and now is used in cities across the U.S. including Chicago, New York, San Francisco, and Boston. In the latter, youth vote on how to spend $1 million of Boston’s city budget to improve their communities, and have in the past supported free Wi-Fi throughout the city and billboards displaying job opportunities for homeless youth.

This is a picture of students going over a budget for Participatory Budgeting.

High school students from Phoenix, Arizona discuss project proposals for participatory budgeting.
Courtesy of Madison Neanover, Center for the Future of Arizona.

Schools across the country are just beginning to realize the potential of implementing participatory budgeting. Bioscience High School in Phoenix, Arizona recently purchased a sustainability education display in the school’s courtyard, color ink for a student-built 3D printer, and camera adapters for laboratory microscopes. All of these initiatives were generated, debated, and voted on by students. While participatory budgeting can offer many benefits to a student’s educational experience, here are three I especially like:

Participatory budgeting can increase student voice in the school community

Many school districts are structured as a top-down governance model in which decisions are made at the district central office and trickle down to the principals, teachers, and students. This model creates dissonance between decisions and the needs of a community. In participatory budgeting, decision making begins with students and forces a response moving up the hierarchy. Empowering students could cultivate a strong school community, invest students in decisions, and promote a collective effort to improve student experiences.

Participatory budgeting can promote civic engagement and democracy

In our current state of political division, distrust in government, and declining knowledge of civics, it is imperative to promote civic engagement in schools. Civic engagement is more than knowing the three branches of government (many Americans don’t) or how a bill becomes law. Civic engagement requires learning competencies and participatory values that foster an engaged citizenry. Research out of Arizona State University found competencies like public speaking, negotiation, conflict resolution, and budgeting are all taught through participatory budgeting in schools. Students learn to be open to new ideas, participate in robust debate, and recognize the importance of listening to others.  As schools place civic education aside for other priorities, participatory budgeting can help fill the gap by building democratic skills and values. Our democracy depends on it.

Participatory budgeting can be fun

Participatory budgeting involves many aspects of school that students find fun. My fifth grade students loved using their creative minds to craft solutions to complex problems. Classroom debates gave my students the opportunity to argue their points based on evidence and reason. Voting on classroom rewards invested them in the academic and social goals they were working towards. (Though be wary that students may vote for messy rewards such as pieing their teaching in the face — see below.) In a time of political division, it is easy to forget how fun democracy can be. If more schools tried participatory budgeting, it could show our nation’s students the joy of democracy.

This picture is of the author after his students pied him in the face.

My students pied me in the face as their classroom reward.

Participatory budgeting is not a silver bullet. Implementation requires thoughtful planning, school and community buy-in, and principal autonomy to use discretionary funds as desired by students. Students should be supported and coached throughout the process just as they are in their classes. Resources are available to help school leaders get started. With strong implementation, I believe participatory budgetings’ potential to empower students, promote democracy, and create fun is a win-win for students, schools, and our nation.  Let’s flip governance on its head and empower students to create positive change in their schools.

This entry was posted in Education Governance, Education Innovation, Education Policy, School Funding, School Governance, School Leadership and tagged Bioscience High School, civic engagement, democracy, participatory budgeting, school budget, school finance, school governance, student voice, Youth Lead the Change on May 10, 2018 by Andrew Frank.

Post navigation

← How Can DC Public Schools Keep Its Best Teachers? Give Them Encouragement, Flexibility, and a Chance to Lead. Do Incarcerated Youth Have Equal Access to Education? Let’s Look at the Data. →

The statements on this blog are the views of the authors alone and should not be considered those of Bellwether Education Partners or of any others within the organization. Bellwether maintains an internal culture that cultivates and respects diverse points of view and does not take organizational positions on education issues.

About

  • About Ahead of the Heard
  • About Bellwether Education

Follow Us

  • Sign Up for Blog Updates
  • RSS Feed

More from Bellwether

  • Eduwonk
  • Teacher Pensions
  • The Learning Landscape

Twitter

Tweets by @bellwethered

Recent Posts

  • Deep into the new school year, we’re still missing a lot of students
  • Three Reasons to Move School Board Elections to November
  • State Governments Will Be Even More Partisan Post 2020. What Does That Mean for Education?
  • Ballot Initiative Results in CA, WA, and Other States — and Implications for Education
  • What Did Joe Biden’s Coalition Look Like? What Does it Mean for Education?

Search by Topic Area

Tags

Accountability annual testing Arne Duncan assessment Betsy DeVos charter schools Common Core Congress COVID-19 Diversity Donald Trump early childhood education education data eightcities equity ESEA ESEA Reauthorization ESSA Every Student Succeeds Act family engagement federal role in education Head Start Inclusion innovation juvenile justice Lamar Alexander Media NCLB NCLB reauthorization NCLB waivers politics pre-k preschool Race Research rural education School Choice school finance state education policy state funding Talent Teacher Evaluation Teacher Preparation testing US Department of Education

Authors

Archives

Log in
Copyright © 2021 Bellwether Education Partners. All rights reserved.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.