Tag Archives: TNTP

You Think You Know about Teacher Professional Development, But You Have No Idea

Conversations about teacher professional development are rarely uplifting: professional development largely does not meet teachers’ needs, few teachers are satisfied with professional development offerings, and principals are concerned about the efficacy of professional development. The list goes on and on. Unfortunately, TNTP’s new reportThe Mirage: Confronting the Hard Truth About Our Quest for Teacher Development—does little to bring optimism to the discussion.

The Mirage details an uncomfortable truth: as much as everyone from Capitol Hill policymakers to school instructional coaches wishes they knew how to help teachers improve, they don’t. TNTP’s research squashes the widely-held belief that good professional development practices are known, they just haven’t been put to scale. It’s a shocking point that many will be talking about in the days and weeks to come. If you want to sound smart joining in on conversations about The Mirage, here are some helpful talking points that scratch its surface:

Districts spend a lot on teacher development. The districts in The Mirage spend an average of nearly $18,000 per teacher, per year, or six to nine percent of the districts’ annual operating budget, on development efforts (the charter management organization in the report spends an average of $33,000 per teacher or 15 percent of its annual budget). This figure includes staff time and resources that are intended to improve instruction either directly or indirectly. At this rate, TNTP calculates that the largest 50 school districts in the U.S. devote at least $8 billion to teacher development.

But money isn’t resulting in improvement. As measured by evaluation scores, most teachers do not improve substantially year to year. Only 30 percent of teachers that TNTP studied improved their performance substantially over a two to three year period.  TNTP could not find anything that distinguished teachers who improved from teachers who did not improve. The professional development activities they participated in and the frequency with which they participated in them were virtually identical between teachers who improved and those who didn’t improve. These two groups of teachers also had strikingly similar perceptions and beliefs about development.

Continue reading

Speaking of School Turnaround Stratgies: Do They Work?

In a recent post on my personal blog, I mentioned school turnarounds as a possible parallel to reforms of criminal justice and law enforcement. I wondered if it is possible to overhaul entire systems or institutions or whether new ones need to built in their stead. (My colleague Andy Smarick has strong opinions on this subject.)

Just in time, a blog post from TNTP (a national teacher effectiveness nonprofit and former Bellwether client), highlighted the question of the effectiveness of turnaround strategies. Rasheed Meadows writes:

The fact is that school turnarounds have a rocky history and a mixed track record, but there’s little evidence that milder interventions result in more meaningful changes for schools and kids. And we know for sure that inaction is not an option.

Read the rest of his post here, which includes Meadows’ personal experience leading–and reforming–a low-performing school in Massachusetts.

The question remains: how can reformers of any system–whether educational or carceral–determine whether to scrap an existing model and start from scratch or work to improve what exists?